The objective of child foster care is to allow parents of a family to rehabilitate themselves to a point where their natural children kept in foster care for their safety can be safely reunited with the family. It would seem then that in the case of Rifqa Bary, the 17 year old convert from Islam to Christianity who fled to Florida in fear of her life and who has since been relocated to Ohio state foster care, that the Bary parents would be undergoing counseling and management for the harm their daughter fears from them.
Rather, the reverse is in full swing in Ohio, as the state has ordered and provided Muslim counseling to Rifqa in some quite dramatic ways. The child in foster care is undergoing rehabilitation – reprogramming in Islam. There are no reports that her family is undergoing any rehabilitation. Rifqa has been assigned a psychologist, who is a Muslim as required by CAIR, the Council on American and Islamic Relations, the organization supporting the Bary family. An imam is available to meet with her daily to reinforce the Muslim faith. She is isolated from Christian friends, who are being prosecuted for befriending her. Recently, the CAIR lawyer for Rifqa’s parents “asked the court to hold her in contempt to force her to attend counseling sessions with a Muslim counselor.” The Christmas eve article by Pamela Geller in the American Thinker explains the dramatic details. {Read the article here: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/the_prosecution_of_Rifqa_Bary.html (Jan. 4, 2009).} The family court denied this contempt request, and has thus far refused to prosecute Rifqa for complaints her family and their religious community have brought against her. This judicial action is commendable, and the court should be prepared to handle continued similar requests.
Rifqa will not be restored to a family who has been rehabilitated - rather, in many ways she may be being reprogrammed by the Islamic community courtesy of the State of Ohio’s foster care system. This is not traditional family reunification in any stretch of the foster care objective.
Considering a reverse scenario brings clarity to these circumstances. If Rifqa had converted from a Christian family to become a Muslim, she would never be forced to have a Christian psychologist or a Christian counselor, and her family would indeed be required to be rehabilitated toward religious sensitivity in the goal of reunification. Rifqa’s first amendment rights to religious freedom would be of utmost importance in that circumstance. Since she has found freedom in a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, however, she has been sometimes treated like the abuser, rather than the abused fearing for her life.
In fact, Rifqa’s fears of becoming the victim of an apostate killing are much more real than most would wish to imagine. There is little to no disagreement among imams and clerics of Islam that require a holy jihad against infidels (non-believers in Islam), agreeing that killing an infidel assures one of a place in heaven. Therefore, followers have been commanded to kill everyone who is not Islamic, being the foundation for apostate killings in Sharia law. This is the very basis of Rifqa’s fears. It is difficult to imagine the current Pope commanding all Catholics to kill all non-Catholics, or to imagine Rick Warren commanding the killing of non-evangelicals – to be guaranteed a place in heaven.
It seems equally difficult to be friends or family with someone who has been commanded to kill you because you believe in a different faith than theirs.
The salient point becomes whether a family court should reunify a child with a family whose religious community commands her death. Jesus Christ commands that His followers love their enemies because they are assured a place in heaven based on His death for them – not based on a command to kill. No clearer illustration could be offered than the RIfqa Bary saga. Her time in foster care is providing vivid evidence of the truth of her fears. Reprogramming her to Islam in Ohio’s foster care system is not going to restore the Bary family. May the Ohio family court continue to be mindful of the goals of their judicial and social welfare system.
Supporting Young Voices: Impact of Trauma-Informed Care in Child Interviews
-
By Natalie Deniston This fall semester, I had the opportunity to work on a
center project researching the best practices for conducting
trauma-informed i...
Thank you for bringing this to our attention....may God strengthen Rifqa to hang onto His great love for her and her family. To be tested in such a way at such a young age, tells me that God has a very wonderful future for her. He will never leave her not forsake her. I will pray for her as a mother for her child..
ReplyDeleteMay we, the Body of Christ, rise up and take our place beside her as she stands for Jesus. It is time for us to come out of the closet and stop hiding behind the false assumption that to be a Christian means to be nice and quiet. Jesus never called us to be nice or quiet. He did say that His followers will lay down their life, pick up their cross and follow Him - and speak the Truth in love. Will the real followers of Jesus please stand up!
ReplyDeleteWAKE UP CHRISTIANS...Shariah law is on its way! My husband and I used to be Muslim and we are now followers of Jesus...my husband has already received a death threat from his oldest brother. This is a very real threat! We live in America and his brother has been here for 25 yrs. There is no assimilation of the idea of religious freedom when it comes to the deep roots of Islamic ideology to cleanse the shame brought by leaving Islam. We will stand for Jesus no matter what the cost!
ReplyDeleteWhat In The World Man! How Quickly Is This Country Dissipating. There Is No Freedom In This Country. We Are Already Slaves Through The Work Force Now Slowly Slaves To A One World Religion. This Is What I See.
ReplyDeleteThis is ridiculous! I remember being in Florida in the living room with my mother when she brought this to my attention. I was extremely saddened but never really thought about Rifqa again until now. It's upsetting to see how Christians are treated differently in modern society. Aside from the argument that had a child been forced to see a Christian counselor or pastor the state would have an issue with it, but the Establishment Clause is also a way that has increasingly singled out Christians. For instance, the judge I worked for my 1L year was telling me how she is paranoid around Christmas time to put a Christmas tree up in her office because it mind offend someone. It's unbelievable how far this country has strayed away from its Christian foundations to the point that it is now singling out Christians and catering to other religions.
ReplyDelete