In the wake of marriage expansion, people of faith can be maligned for holding to basic ideas of marriage.
Governors for both Delaware (see
more) and Rhode Island (see more) have signed into law resolutions to expand marriage for same sex
partners. Meanwhile, private individuals of faith are being coerced
into support for marriage expansion, or denigrated for their support of
marriage.
At the end of April, ESPN Reporter Chris Broussard came under attack for supporting marriage in an Outside the Lines piece. See
commentary and a link to that segment here.
In Oregon a bakery owner who refused to provide a cake for a lesbian
wedding is being investigated by the State for violations of Oregon's
non-discrimination act. You can see the case here. This case is just in the beginning stages.
Meanwhile, a Seattle florist is also being sued for refusing to provide
wedding flowers for a same sex wedding. You can see more about that
story at here.
Regent alumna Anna Adams, now an attorney in Oregon, has written about
these issues in her recent article published by the Regent Journal of
Law and Public Policy, which can be accessed here.
Family restoration requires people of faith to be able to freely hold to
their beliefs on marriage, enjoy First Amendment rights to speak about
those beliefs in an appropriate time, place, and manner, and to continue
to practice their faith by holding to their beliefs on marriage, as the
United States Constitution guarantees.
Sports stories and wedding
arrangement vendors should not be maligned for their views on marriage.
Supporting Young Voices: Impact of Trauma-Informed Care in Child Interviews
-
By Natalie Deniston This fall semester, I had the opportunity to work on a
center project researching the best practices for conducting
trauma-informed i...
No comments:
Post a Comment