This blog post is from Allison Allgood, Regent Law 2L, and FA 2020 Wills, Trusts & Estates student:
While
physician assisted suicide is not legal in Virginia and most other
states, there are some reasons why some want it legalized and some reasons why
others want it to remain illegal. One of the biggest reasons that helps support
the legalization of physician assisted suicide stems from a sense of the
freedom of disposition, a basic tenet of wealth transfer which we discussed in
Wills class all semester. This rule holds that the testator’s intent controls
the disposition of his or her assets, with limited exceptions. Applying this
rule over assets to bodily autonomy, should an individual be able to make
his or her own decision regarding the end of life? Patient
autonomy is a crucial theme in this
argument. Furthermore, many argue that physician assisted suicide could be
attractive because it relieves
a patient’s suffering in cases of painful long-term illnesses.
Those who hold to the sanctity of human life oppose physician assisted suicide arguing that it could be a slippery slope and lead to more cases of people who choose physician assisted suicide simply to avert a burden on their friends and families, rather than see their lives as valued by family. Another argument against physician assisted suicide is that many people with life-threatening diseases and the elderly tend to develop clinical depression, which work to impair their sound decision-making. Instead of being referred to a psychiatrist or counselor, many patients in those situations may choose physician assisted suicide simply because they have no support to handle their illness. Perhaps if they knew about their clinical depression, and had family support, many would choose psychiatric help for that depression instead of resorting to death by physician assisted suicide.
I think that the most compelling con to physician
assisted suicide is that it cuts against the idea of family
restoration. When one resorts to suicide, a link in a family is forever
broken, especially when that link could have been restored through
counseling or other psychiatric treatment. As one author
puts it, physician
assisted suicide “does not address the needs of dying patients and their
families.”
The permanence of physician assisted suicide and the toll it will
take on one’s family members can be very powerful reasons
to resist physician assisted suicide and its legalization. Another
disadvantage to legalizing physician assisted suicide that has been suggested
is that it disproportionately affects women, especially those who have
experienced trauma. (See Lynne Marie Kohm and Britney N. Brigner, Women and Assisted Suicide: Exposing
the Gender Vulnerability to Acquiescent Death, 4 Cardozo Women's Law
Journal 241 (1998).
These are very serious considerations for you and your
family. Working toward family
restoration allows for an informed and helpful conversation about what’s best
to restore your family and the lives of your family members.
No comments:
Post a Comment