This guest post is from Eric Phillips, Regent
Law 3L and Family Law student:
When I was around twenty-two, a few
years after Roe, I met through friends a young woman who was
pregnant. She was considering an abortion. I told her of a clinic
where she could get very good care. The clinic had suction abortion
equipment. I gave her the clinic number and she called the clinic and
scheduled an appointment. To my surprise (and now great relief) I found
out that she had cancelled her appointment. You see, since the age of
fourteen or so I was a non-church going Episcopalian. I was water
immersed before the age of accountability. I did not have a relationship
with God the Father, Jesus the son who is my brother and I his, or the Holy
Spirit my friend. I was ignorant and so was the abortion doctor whom I
had previously found out was raised Baptist but was not a practicing Christian
since his early teens. Aborting fetuses was a small part of his general
practice.
The reason for the focus on ignorance
is that God says, “My people perish for lack of knowledge . . . .”. This
does not necessarily mean that only you perish for lack of your knowledge, but
that others can perish due to your lack of knowledge. The effect that the
law had on me and others at that time was that in my ignorance it was ok to
have an abortion since it was the law. In my ignorance another was on the
way to perish, but thankfully was spared. It was not that there was a fair
choice of death or life for that child in the womb, but that due to the
prevalence of the law being pro-abortion, abortion was placed not only above life
in specific instances, but the “right” to put to death a child in the womb had
a higher status than a child’s life. There was only a guarantee that a
child could be killed in the womb at will. It was never guaranteed that
the child would live. You could stop life, but you could not stop the
killing.
A few years
later I was in the company of a friend from high school. We were
discussing abortion and I told him that I am not the one to make the decision
to abort. And that I believe the female should have the right to
determine what to do with her own body. He agreed. I told him that
it should be her decision whether to continue to term. He agreed. That it
can interfere with her future so far as jobs and plans. That the decision
should be left to her as it would be emotionally trying and for other physical
health reasons. And for all these reasons he had agreed. And then
I told him that the female I was talking about was not the mother, but the
female in the womb. He was stunned in the same way as King David was when
Nathan questioned what David should do with the “person” who had committed the
ill acts David himself had committed without letting on to David who that
person was. That story ended in the killing of a husband, Bathsheba’s
husband Uriah the Hittite. David condemned his own actions unto
death. I call this pulling a Nathan.
The doctor
referenced above was my father. He had saved multitudes of people in World War
II and in his professional practice. He came to know Jesus Christ and
Father God. He has been forgiven as I have been forgiven and any other
person who has asked forgiveness, including countless women who have had
abortions. By God's grace, God is faithful and righteous to forgive
us our sins.
No comments:
Post a Comment