http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/230283-house-rejects-bill-penalizing-doctors-for-sex-selection-abortions.
This update below from the Law of Life Project (cofounded by Regent Law alum Ann Bruwalda and her Jubliee Campaign) discusses the process and implications of the event with some embedded video investigation by Live Action:
Pro-Abortion Democrats Block Bill to Ban Gendercide through Sex-Selection Abortions
"The most dangerous place for a woman to be should not be in her mother's womb."
-Samuel B. Casey, Managing Director & General Counsel
Jubilee Campaign, Law of Life Project-
Democrats in the House of Representatives prevented passage of a H.R. 3541, the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act (PRENDA) which would have banned sex-selection abortions. The legislation needed a two-thirds vote and Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the legislation after President Barack Obama and Planned Parenthood came out in opposition.
With a 246-168 vote, the bill did not obtain the two-thirds majority necessary to pass. Republicans voted for the bill on a 226-7 margin while Democrats opposed banning sex-selection abortions on 161-20 vote margin.
The bill would make it a federal offense to knowingly do any one of the following four things: (1) perform an abortion, at any time in pregnancy, "knowing that such abortion is sought based on the sex or gender of the child"; (2) use "force or threat of force. . . for the purpose of coercing a sex-selection abortion"; (3) solicit or accept funds to perform a sex-selection abortion; or (4) transport a woman into the U.S. or across state lines for this purpose. However, the bill says "A woman upon whom a sex-selection abortion is performed may not be prosecuted or held civilly liable for any violation . . ."
The bill also specifically states, "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require that a healthcare provider has an affirmative duty to inquire as to the motivation for the abortion, absent the healthcare provider having knowledge or information that the abortion is being sought based on the sex or gender of the child."
Leading pro-life groups were aghast that Democrats would stand in the way of passing what should be a common sense bill. Sam Casey, Managing Director and General Counsel of Jubilee Campaign's Law of Life Project, said: "While not surprised, we are deeply saddened that there our members of the U.S. House of Representatives who say they are pro-women but would vote to keep sex-selection abortion used primarily to intentionally kill girl babies in this country. That anyone on either side of the political aisle would vote against a bill preventing such a gendercide in the United States is profoundly troubling. Given that CDC data suggests sex-selection abortion is occurring in our country, and a recent undercover video released this week by Live Action showing Planned Parenthood's willingness to facilitate a sex-selection abortion, the American public cannot ignore this sexist practice."But because of lobbying by Planned Parenthood and the White House, the bill to protect against sex-selection abortion failed. We applaud the 246 Members on both sides of the aisle who voted for the bill. We thank Rep. Trent Franks and the House leadership for holding a vote on this legislation to ban this tragic and discriminatory practice. We will continue to work with them to pass this legislation in the future, so that pre-born women across the nation will be protected from gendercide and sex discrimination," Casey concluded.
NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson said: "We are heartened that a strong majority of House members voted to ban performing or coercing abortions for the purpose of eliminating unborn babies of an undesired sex - usually, girls. Shamefully, President Obama, and a minority of 168 House members, complied with the political demands of pro-abortion pressure groups, rather than defend the coerced women, and their unborn daughters, who are victimized by sex-selection abortions."
Among the organizations that warned House members not to vote for the bill was the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA). PPFA sent an email memo to House members on May 29 warning of its "intent to score" a vote for the bill as a vote against "women's health." Also on May 29, the Huffington Post reported that "no Planned Parenthood clinic will deny a woman an abortion based on her reasons for wanting one, except in those states that explicitly prohibit sex-selective abortions (currently Arizona, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Illinois).
"We commend the House Republican leadership for bringing this bill to the floor today under the fast-track procedure," Johnson said. "Today's groundbreaking majority vote was a stepping stone to this bill ultimately becoming law - perhaps after the replacement of some of the lawmakers who today were unwilling to protect victimized women and their unborn daughters from sex-selection abortions, because they were more concerned with maintaining favor with the abortion industry, pro-abortion advocacy groups, and Hollywood donors."
Obama's opposition comes after a new video exposing how Planned Parenthood encourages women to have sex-selection abortions. A second video showing another Planned Parenthood clinic okaying sex-selection abortions has followed it up.
As we reported yesterday, a few years ago, a national study showed the possibility that the practice of sex-selection abortions has made its way from Asia to the United States. Researchers Douglas Almond and Lena Edlund of the National Academy of Sciences say their analysis of the 2000 Census shows the odds prematurely increasing for Asian-American families from China, Korea and India to have a boy if they already have a girl child.
The data "suggest that in a sub-population with a traditional son preference, the technologies are being used to generate male births when preceding births are female," they wrote in the paper. Previously, abortion advocates not only opposed the bill in great hysteria but also denied the very existence of sex selection abortions. Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights, called it a "trumped up bill for a trumped up problem." Meanwhile at the pro-abortion blog Jezebel, a writer called sex selection abortions "a problem rampant only in its rampant nonexistence."
A recent poll conducted by the Lozier Institute found that 77% of respondents would support the enactment of laws prohibiting abortion in cases where "the fact that the developing baby is a girl is the sole reason for seeking an abortion." Illinois, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma and Arizona already have laws on the books which prohibit this practice, according to the Lozier Institute.
Meanwhile, a 2006 poll showed a majority of Americans would likely support the bill. A 2006 Zogby International poll showed that 86% of the American public desired a law to ban sex-selection abortion. The poll surveyed a whopping 30,117 respondents in 48 states.
ACTION: Click here to see how your lawmakers voted and tell them what you think of their votes.
No comments:
Post a Comment